This article is based on two speeches made at 8 March conference in Gothenburg, Sweden and the conference in London to commemorate Dua, the young girl who was stoned to death in Iraq last year. The conference condemns the Islamic Republic of Iran for its systematic attacks, persecution and imprisonment of women in Iran for not observing the veil.
Today all speakers talked about honour crimes as a widespread form of violence against women. What bewilders me is the name given to this horrendous crime: honour. Honour has a very positive connotation. Regardless of one’s world outlook and beliefs, the word honour has a good ring to one’s ear. When you hear this word, you fill up with positive and good feelings. The combination of these two completely opposite concepts to describe one phenomenon brings a lot of contradictions and confusion: “honour crimes!”
I have given this phenomenon a great deal of thought. I posed this question: Why is this brutal act being described so positively? After reflecting on this issue for some time, I came to see a pattern. It is like crimes committed under the name of patriotism and nationalism. The more you kill, the more brutal you become, the more heroic your status. This is exactly the same. The more inhuman you become under the name of misogyny, the more elevated your status among the community.
Misogynic crimes which are sanctified by religion and old traditions are called honour crimes, in order to be glorified, to be elevated to the position of heroic acts worthy of medals. Honour crimes are encouraged by traditional values, which are passed on from generation to generation. I will argue here that a certain ideology is behind justifying and glorifying crimes against women and by doing this promoting not only such crimes, but also fostering the dominance of religion and patriarchy. I will then conclude that one way to fight against such crimes is to shed all religious and cultural romanticism and taboos surrounding this brutal act. This is to say that our fight against honour crimes is not only an educative one or in the field of law and order, it is apolitical and ideological one as well. Misogynic ideology is a vital instrument in justifying and glorifying honour crimes.
There may be an objection raised here and quite validly too: not all misogynic crimes are named honour crimes. True. However, those criminal acts committed against women and girls, because they dared violate the sacred codes of piousness of the community are called honour crimes. Modern reformed misogyny has more or less come to terms with women’s ownership of their sexuality. Nevertheless, crimes categorized as crime of passion, committed under the fury of jealousy still shares that element of ownership of female sexuality by the male partner. It has only been privatized; it is an individual act punished by the law. But women’s rights organizations still struggle to have these crimes recognized as serious crimes, they still fight to get enough attention by the official institutions to these crimes that are mitigated or ignored by the fact they take place in the privacy of the home and in the confines of the sacred family. Our focus here is, however, on the first category.
The answer to all of these is Ideology. Ideology is the means by which our minds are formed or manipulated to interpret the world, and thereby give different, and at times opposite meanings to similar actions. The dominant ideology is preserved and reproduced by the ruling classes in every given society. Religion is one of the main ingredients in dominant ideologies world wide.
Let us examine this in a more concrete historical context. We will only dwell on examples that can be related to our subject. Killing for a justified cause or terrorism, this is the question put before us time and time again. Depending on our political inclinations or our ideological tendencies, we answer this question one way or the other. At time sit is more challenging to come with a straightforward answer. Our sympathies are divided, so our response is confused. There seems to be no other way to judge. As a rule, if we sympathies with a cause we tend to justify the action related to it or stemmed from it.
The African national Congress is a very good example to demonstrate how this dynamism works. ANC was considered a terrorist organisation by the apartheid regime in South Africa and by its Western supporters. In the late seventies and early eighties this image changed. ANC came to be recognized, universally, as a legitimate, progressive organisation, so-called freedom-fighter, and its leader Nelson Mandela became an international hero, and was awarded the Noble peace prize. Here we can see how an image or concept can change in people’s views, giving the political or ideological explanations.
Let us look at a more controversial case. Suicide bombings committed by Palestinians against Israelis are regarded a vile crime by Israelis and heroic sacrifice by Palestinians. By the same token, in any war killing the enemy wins a medal for the killer and hatred and vengeance by the other party. How do we come to form these views? They are political views formed by our world outlook and value system, that is, ideology.
Misogyny is an old ideology and integrated part of all religions. In this day, we still witness the reduction of punishments by the court of law, in more advanced part of the world for the so-called crime of passion. Passion and honour are names given by the official ideology to crimes against women by the men who are taught to believe women are their possessions, their properties.
One way to fight these horrendous crimes is to challenge the prevailing ideology. Sexism and misogyny has been the subject of many debates and protest movements. One way to shake this old value system is to attack its basis. I believe the so-called honour crimes should be called terrorism against women. Just the same way female circumcision came to be called female mutilation. This change of name had a great impact on shedding all the absurd cultural romanticism associated with this brutal abuse (which led well known feminists such as Germaine Greer defend it.) This is not an attempt to inflate a reality for the sake of propaganda. In reality “honour crimes ”are nothing but terrorist acts against women.
Action aimed at silencing, subduing and blackmailing certain people for apolitical aim is terrorism. Ideologies have been created in order to justify and/or glorify a terrorist act. Historically, nationalist, and certain left groups have been categorized under this title, e.g. the IRA, the left groups in Italy and Germany in the seventies, and groups fighting for independence in so-called third world countries. In these fights a much defined political cause dominates. At present, there is apolitical/ideological battle over whether you can call fighters of a “just” cause terrorists, regardless of the similarity of the methods they use. A heated debate is over how to call Palestinian suicide bombers, are they terrorists or soldiers of a nationalist army fighting for their land and independence? We have gone as far as calling some states terrorists, and the war they wage state terrorism, such as the United States and Israel, or Islamic republic of Iran.
This is the place to pass judgment on these above-mentioned cases.. I merely stated these for the sake of argument, to demonstrate the similarities between these political cases and honour crimes, these seemingly unconnected acts. I believe there is a very strong common denominator between these acts, which bring them under the same category: terrorism. Honour crimes can be categorized under this term.
If straightforward political conflicts that lead to terrorist acts can cause confusion as how they should be judged, i.e. legitimate or murderous, and at times there are endless debates involved in the process of judgment-forming, there is no confusion regarding honour crimes. Except the fanatics ,who endorse or carry out such crimes, everyone else condemns honour crimes as abhorring murders. Moreover, there is a common agreement among all, including the fanatics, over the purpose of these crimes: to subdue the female population, to show her rightful place in the home and the community, to suppress any thought of rebellion.“ Honour crimes” wash away the shame from the family and the community, and teach a “good” lesson not only to women but to the whole society :women are property of the men of the household; they should remain subdued, pious, and silent and obey the laws and their owners.
All the religious leaders who promote or condone honour crimes will testify to these, the elders, the youth stooped by this ideology, the mothers and the victims, too will testify to this. We should conclude that honour crimes are carried out to put women in their place and prevent their rebellion or protest. Thus, honour crimes, are crimes with apolitical purpose, to foster or establish a misogynic power relations in the society and the family. Moreover, they are not individual and isolated crimes. They are usually planned in the extended family court. They are promoted by the “leaders” of the community. (Be it the leaders of a society in the case of societies under a backward religious state, or smaller communities in the West.) They are crimes sanctified by a community and carried out collectively. It is a crime with a socio-political cause and aim, justified by an ideology, carried out as a team. Hence, we have established the relation between a terrorist act and honour crimes.
It is important that we spread this word around. Start a movement demanding honour crimes to be called by their appropriate name: terrorism against women. It will help us fight more vigorously against these crimes and to alleviate the situation of women and young girls in such communities. It makes it easier to punish the criminals. It gives our campaign a momentum to mobilize more strongly and to attract more support to our cause. As a final point, I like to make the parallel once more between this and the campaign to change the name of female circumcision to female mutilation. It did not take very long to establish in the public mind that female circumcision is actually mutilating women in order to inhibit their sexuality. By bringing this awareness all the cultural romanticism or taboo was torn from it. Hence, it became easier to fight against it. We should do the same to “honour” crimes. By calling it terrorism against women we facilitate the fight to root it out.
Organization of Women's Freedom in Iraq
September 14, 2004
In one of the public health sectors in the city of Mousul, the Islamists committed some of their numerous misogynist crimes that aim relentlessly to quench their thirst for blood and hatred for women.
The Islamist terrorist savages could not tolerate women who work and feed themselves and their families. They want them blindfolded, covered by Hijab and heavy rags thrown in the kitchens of their houses serving as slaves. They want them humiliated, with no opinion or character or a normal life like any sane human being of our time.
Political Islamic groups exploited the chaos, lack of security and absence of law since the USA's ominous war and subsequent occupation to disseminate horror and terrorism across Iraq. Everyday, they add more transgressions to their criminal record against civility and women's rights. Recently these women were murdered by the Islamists:
- Lina al-Aswad a medical doctor who has been practicing for the last 10 years. She was shot dead in Al Qayara - Mousul.
- Hefi Abdul Satar a pharmacist in al-Khansaa Hospital. She was gunned down before her house in al-Noor suburb. Her family is also threatened to be killed by these terrorists.
- Sanabul Nwel Tabakh a veterinarian killed in Wahda suburb in Mousul while on her way to work.
- Layla Abdulla al-Haj Said a professor of Law and Dean of the Law Faculty at the University of Mousl. She was gunned down with her husband. She was also beheaded to further terrorize people in that suburb.
- Iman Abdul Monem Younis, a lecturer at the Faculty of Languages and head of Translation Department at the University of Mousul, was gunned down.
- Tagrid Abdul Masih a public servant in the town of Bartila.
- Hala Abdul Masih (Tagrid's sister) a public servant in Bartila.
- Tara Majeed Butros a public servant in Bartilla.
Mass killing is practiced against women working as interpreters or as workers with foreign companies. Many were murdered in the last several months in Baghdad and other Iraqi cities.
Political Islam's violence against women must be stopped. The terrorist Islamic forces must be expelled from the Iraqi society. This task relies on the will power of women and men who are seeking a world where freedom and security prevail. This goal will only take place if the secular and freedom-loving forces stand up to Islamic terrorism, which claims the lives of more women every moment merely for being women.
Let us make ending Islamic terrorism against women in Iraq our priority and urgent task.
Join the Organization of Women's Freedom in Iraq to struggle together to put an end to Islamist violence against women.
We call on all women and men in Iraq and worldwide to collaborate and struggle to end Islamist violence against women.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Risking Her Life to Expose Islam
By Melissa Charbonneau
CBN News
August 24, 2007
CBNNews.com -
WASHINGTON - "Islamic dogma creates a cult of death, a cage for women, and a curse against knowledge," writes Ayaan Hirsi Ali.
Her words incite outrage, make her the target of constant death threats, and force her to travel 'round-the-clock with armed bodyguards.
"I am convinced that there is a threat from radical Islam, that it is threatening, that people here are really very complacent," Hirsi Ali said.
To many in the West, 37-year-old Hirsi Ali is a defender of Muslim women's rights, the millenium's Salman Rushdie. But to most of the Islamic world, she is an infidel.
In her autobiography Infidel, Hirsi Ali describes her childhood as a Muslim in Somalia; her escape from an arranged marriage; and her asylum in the Netherlands where she rose to become a Dutch member of parliament.
Based today in Washington, D.C., Hirsi Ali is risking her life to expose Islam. It's a religion that she says subjugates Muslim women to lives of slavery, suffering, and submission.
Submission is the title of a film Hirsi Ali wrote and co-produced in Holland. It reveals Quranic verses that condone the beating of women, forced marriage, and punishment for victims of rape.
One line of the film reads, "Each time my uncle comes to see me, I feel caged, like an animal waiting for slaughter."
Blasphemy worthy of death was the verdict of Muslim clerics.
Hirsi Ali said, "I had taken verses from the Quran considered holy in themselves, and I had written them on the surface -- the most contemptible surface -- the skin of a woman."
After the film's release, Director Theo van Gogh was assassinated on the streets of Amsterdam -- shot to death, his throat slit, and a knife stuck his chest with a letter that listed Hirsi Ali's crimes against Islam.
But Islam's crimes against women are what concern Hirsi Ali. She says the Muslim obsession with virginity is behind the brutal practice of female genital mutilation.
Hirsi said, "There is no Hadith, or sayings of the Prophet, with 100-percent certainty that he condoned or urged girls to be genitally mutilated.. But if you look at the list of countries where female genital mutilation is practiced and especially where it happens to more than 90 percent of the females, you'll see that they're all Muslim. That's very interesting."
Like 98 percent of Somali girls, Hirsi Ali and her sister suffered the mutilation without anesthesia at the hand of their grandmother. It was an excruciating procedure that not all survive.
"But if you survive it, urinating is painful, menstruating is painful, sex is painful, giving birth is painful, so you end up leading a life of pain," Hirsi Ali said.
Hirsi Ali says that she doesn't blame her family, but Islam that teaches the subordination of women.
Hirsi Ali said, "So my grandmother's conviction that I must remain a virgin -- that I would not find husband if I was not circumcised -- that I would therefore be a piece of vulnerable sheep fat on the streets -- that is inspired by her beliefs in Islam."
She can cite verses from the Quran instructing husbands to beat their wives. And she says Islam's leader set the original perverse example.
"The prophet Mohammed married a 6-year-old child and consummated the marriage when she was nine. Child brides are rampant in Muslim communities," Hirsi Ali said.
Although a small minority of Muslim women support her work, Hirsi Ali says most cannot or will not speak against the faith. She said, "Here are many whose spirits have been killed when they were small. There are many who fear change."
Hirsi Ali renounced Islam after 9/11 -- her response to Osama bin Laden's calls for jihad. Those rantings were not from radical elements who hijacked the religion, she says, but from hostility that is rooted deep in the Quran.
"'These infidels were now in Muslim lands and shedding Muslim blood. And if you shed Muslim blood, all Muslims are obligated to join in that.' Now he was making all these quotations and getting them from Mohammed," Hirsi Ali said.
Hirsi Ali says that's a problem for Westerners like President Bush who call Islam a "great religion."
She said, "I can disagree with President Bush and say he's wrong -- say he has no idea what he's saying, and must prove that it's great -- and he won't come and behead me. He won't put me in jail."
That's not the case in most Muslim nations, Hirsi Ali says. She contends that Islam is incompatible with democracy. It tramples on human rights and denies free speech.
In Washington, Hirsi Ali challenged journalists to question the tenets of the faith.
Ali said, "This is what I'm trying to tell journalists. What Muslim leader in any country can you criticize as a citizen of that country, as a visitor, as a journalist, without getting into trouble?"
Hirsi Ali's views have won her dangerous enemies. But she says that the radical Islamic threat is real and that the West has grown complacent. She warns Westerners that if they don't resist a culture that oppresses women and schools children in hate, the consequences could be severe.
"If we don't push back, then like Turkey, like the Turkish secular people, one day we'll wake up to an Islamic reality and that's not what I want," Hirsi Ali said.
A solitary voice in a life-or-death debate, the former Muslim says that despite the death threats, she'll continue to speak out in the battle over values of the West versus those of Islam.
Hirsi Ali said, "Because freedom is also worth dying for and fighting for."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The suffering of Algeria's women at the hands of Islamists
"The treatment of women raises serious questions about the level of faith and Islamic behavior on the part of the protagonists in the civil war in Algeria. Islam itself is being disfigured and perverted!"
Aicha Lemsine, Middle East Times, Cairo, March 16, 2001
The human rights of ordinary Algerians, and in particular Algerian women, are under siege. Crimes against human dignity occur every day, with women the targets of much of the violence.
Yet Algerian women have been tragically ignored by their government and forgotten by the national and international media. International humanitarian organizations have yet to respond in any meaningful way.
Do they know that women and girls are dying in terrorist attacks across Algeria? Two hundred women have been killed over the last three years, aside from those who have "disappeared."
As in Bosnia, Algerian women are the first victims of the civil war in their country. In the Balkans, rape and forced pregnancy were tactics of "ethnic cleansing"; in Algeria, the persecution of women is a key element of "religious cleansing."
Young or old, veiled or not, Algerian women are powerful symbols for all of the rival factions vying for power. Some kill women because they wear the hijab, or headscarf.
Other women are targeted because they are intellectuals, because they work and because they are resolutely and unabashedly modern.
Why this persecution of women? Why, of all the Islamists in all the countries of the Arab-Muslim world, do the Islamists of Algeria alone kill women as a matter of strategy?
Old women have had their throats slit in their own homes, like 94-year-old Boudjar Kethoum of Sidi Bel-Abbes.
Students, both veiled and unveiled, have been gunned down in the street, kidnapped or raped and then murdered like 19-year-old Zoulikha Boughadou and her 15-year-old sister, Saida.
Four young Algerian women lost their lives in three separate incidents. One of these, 15-year-old Fatima Ghodbane, was dragged from her school by six gunmen who then slit her throat.
A second, Yamina Amrani, was pregnant when she was killed by eight men in her home in Tessala El-Mardja.
Three men shot dead Amel Guedjali, 19, and her sister Karima, 18, in front of their father and a younger sister in their house outside Algiers.
These are not unique cases. Women die day after day.
Discussion of war crimes against women (carried out in their own country by their own countrymen) is not to deny the tragedy of the thousands of male victims cut down by terrorism since 1992. Rather it is intended to break the silence surrounding the agony of Algerian women.
The present situation in Algeria is different from that of Egypt, Palestine and even Afghanistan. In these cases, although state authorities and their Islamist rivals are locked in battles for power, both sides pursue strategies and tactics in which barbarous treatment of women and children is more or less avoided.
In Algeria, by contrast, wall posters threaten women with death if they go to the hammam (public baths for women), frequent beauty salons, work, play sports or study music or art. The hijab is now the supreme obligation.
The treatment of women raises serious questions about the level of faith and Islamic behavior on the part of the protagonists in the civil war in Algeria..
All involved-the state functionaries, the police, the military and the Islamists-are Muslims. Even Islamic activists like Sudan's Hassan Al Turabi have disavowed the war against Algerian women.
Tunisian Islamist Rachid Ghannouchi declared, "As Islamists ourselves, we are ashamed at what Algerian Islamists are doing to women!"
Only ashamed? Islam itself is being disfigured and perverted! To see how far events in Algeria have strayed from the ideals of the faith, one need only recall the celebrated case of Hind, wife of the leader of the pagan Quraysh of Mecca and perhaps the Prophet Muhammad's fiercest enemy, Abu Sufyan.
During the Battle of Uhud (625 CE), which pitted the Meccans against the Muslims, Hind roamed the battlefield defiling the corpses of the Muslim dead, cutting off their ears and noses and stringing them on her necklace. She also paid a Meccan slave to seek out and slay Hamza, an uncle of the Prophet, during the battle.
Yet Hind was not condemned to death by either the Prophet or his Companions. When the Muslims entered Mecca five years after Uhud, Hind was among those who came to give their allegiance to Muhammad. She responded to the Prophet's terms with bitter sarcasm.
When Muhammad forbade the Meccans from killing their children (infanticide being common in pre-Islamic Arabia), Hind snapped, "Do we have any children left that you didn't kill at Badr?" referring to a battle where a small band of Muslims exacted heavy losses on the Quraysh.
Despite her actions and her attitude, Hind was spared, as were the other women who opposed Islam in its formative period.
This was the "golden era" of the Prophet Muhammad and the four "rightly guided" caliphs; Abu Bakr, Omar, Othman and Ali.
After that time obscurantism and the most retrograde misogyny reversed the position of Muslim women.
The only case of wise government mentioned in the Koran is that of a woman-Bilqis, the Queen of Sheba. Closer to our time, in 1250 CE, Shagarat Al Dur ruled Egypt and had the Friday prayers said in her name in the country's mosques.
Therefore, one must ask where the self-proclaimed Islamists find their program for society, in which women are made subservient under the law and which bases its future upon the corpses of women.
Aicha Lemsine is an award-winning Algerian author. She lives in Algeria and publishes political analyses in the Algerian and international Arab press. She is a member of the PEN Club's International Women's Committee and vice-president of WORLD, the Women's Organization for Rights, Literature and Development.
-------------------------------------------------------
Stoning and Islam
Although stoning has a long history in a number of different traditions (including Jewish and Greek histories) the practice has since grown to be associated with Islam and Muslim cultures. In fact, there is no mention of stoning in the Quran, and the practice is only implied in the Hadith in the context of the Prophet Muhammad’s dealings with Jewish Law.
Stoning is a highly debated topic within the Muslim religious community, and reputable Iranian clerics, such as Ayatollah Nasser Makarem Shirazi, Ayatollah Yousef Saneii and Ayatollah Seyyed Mohamamd Mousavi Bojnourdi, have spoken out against it. Nobel Peace Prize Winner Shirin Ebadi, too, has spoken out against the practice, explaining that stoning should not be accepted as Islamic Law and only serves to humiliate and defame Islam. Others have led lively theological debates to convey that the practice is not Islamic.
Many Muslim nations such as Malaysia, Indonesia, Tunisia, Algeria and others have banned death by stoning. Despite calls for abolition from around the globe, stoning still occurs in several countries, either under law or by the community.
To learn more about Stoning and Islam, see:
“Islam and Abolition Are Compatible”
Interview with Mustapha Bouhandi, Professor Comparative Religion
In this interview by IPS news, Mustapha Bouhandi, professor of comparative religion at Hassan II University in Casablanca, states that the Quran does not support the death penalty, and that to oppose the death penalty is not to go against the teachings of Islam.
http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=39461
“In Khomeini’s Opinion, Original Judiciary did not Order Stoning”
Interview with Ayatollah Bojnourdi
[In Persian]
Ayatollah Bojnourdi, who was very close to Iranian leader Ayatollah Khomeini, states that Khomeini himself passed an order to the Iranian Judiciary banning stoning under pressure from European states. According to Bojnourdi, Khomeini agreed that the Quran does not dictate stoning, and thus removed it from his fatwa.
http://baztab.ir/news/72300.php
“Practice of the Stoning Is In Our Laws”
Interview with Shirin Ebadi:
Nobel Peace Prize winner Shirin Ebadi gives her opinion on the stoning issue. She takes a partially human rights framework to argue for its abolition and gives religious arguments for why it should be banned. Giving background on the judicial system in Iran, Ebadi also explains why a judicial moratorium is not enough to stop stoning.
http://meydaan.net/English/showarticle.aspx?arid=133&cid=46
“Comparative Study of Stoning Punishment in the Religions of Islam and Judaism”
By: Sanaz Alasty
In Justice Policy Journal, Volume 4—No.1—Spring 2007.
Alasti gives an academic comparative study on stoning in religions of Judaism and Islam. He argues that stoning, as an obvious human rights abuse, should be reinterpreted within the framework of Islam in order to be banned. He provides detailed background on the religious interpretations of stoning in the two religions.
http://www.cjcj.org/pdf/comparative_study.pdf
“Fatwa Banning Practice of Stoning”
[In Persian]
Ayatollah Yousef Sanei, who is known for his moderate views and more women-friendly interpretations of Sharia, states that stoning and other physical punishments within the "Law of Retribution" (qisas) such as hand cutting can be declared as prohibited or forbidden (mamnoo`) during the absence of the "hidden Imam".
http://www.roozonline.com/archives/2007/08/006654.php
-------------------------------------------------------
Report on the Taliban's War Against Women
Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor
November 17, 2001
The Taliban's War Against Women
The day was much like any other. For the young Afghan mother, the only difference was that her child was feverish and had been for some time and needed to see a doctor. But simple tasks in Taliban-controlled Afghanistan today are not that easy.
The mother was alone and the doctor was across town. She had no male relative to escort her. To ask another man to do so would be to risk severe punishment. To go on her own meant that she would risk flogging.
Because she loved her child, she had no choice. Donning the tent-like burqa as Taliban law required, she set out, cradling her child in her arms. She shouldn't have.
As they approached the market, she was spotted by a teenage Taliban guard who tried to stop her. Intent on saving her child, the mother ignored him, hoping that he would ignore her. He didn't. Instead he raised his weapon and shot her repeatedly. Both mother and child fell to the ground. They survived because bystanders in the market intervened to save them. The young Taliban guard was unrepentent -- fully supported by the regime. The woman should not have been out alone.
This mother was just another casualty in the Taliban war on Afghanistan's women, a war that began 5 years ago when the Taliban seized control of Kabul.
Abuses of an Oppressive Regime
Prior to the rise of the Taliban, women in Afghanistan were protected under law and increasingly afforded rights in Afghan society. Women received the right to vote in the 1920s; and as early as the 1960s, the Afghan constitution provided for equality for women. There was a mood of tolerance and openness as the country began moving toward democracy. Women were making important contributions to national development. In 1977, women comprised over 15% of Afghanistan's highest legislative body. It is estimated that by the early 1990s, 70% of schoolteachers, 50% of government workers and university students, and 40% of doctors in Kabul were women. Afghan women had been active in humanitarian relief organizations until the Taliban imposed severe restrictions on their ability to work. These professional women provide a pool of talent and expertise that will be needed in the reconstruction of post-Taliban Afghanistan.
Islam has a tradition of protecting the rights of women and children. In fact, Islam has specific provisions which define the rights of women in areas such as marriage, divorce, and property rights. The Taliban's version of Islam is not supported by the world's Muslims. Although the Taliban claimed that it was acting in the best interests of women, the truth is that the Taliban regime cruelly reduced women and girls to poverty, worsened their health, and deprived them of their right to an education, and many times the right to practice their religion. The Taliban is out of step with the Muslim world and with Islam.
Afghanistan under the Taliban had one of the worst human rights records in the world. The regime systematically repressed all sectors of the population and denied even the most basic individual rights. Yet the Taliban's war against women was particularly appalling.
Women are imprisoned in their homes, and are denied access to basic health care and education. Food sent to help starving people is stolen by their leaders. The religious monuments of other faiths are destroyed. Children are forbidden to fly kites, or sing songs... A girl of seven is beaten for wearing white shoes.
-- President George W. Bush, Remarks to the Warsaw Conference on Combating Terrorism, November 6, 2001
The Taliban first became prominent in 1994 and took over the Afghan capital, Kabul, in 1996. The takeover followed over 20 years of civil war and political instability. Initially, some hoped that the Taliban would provide stability to the country. However, it soon imposed a strict and oppressive order based on its misinterpretation of Islamic law.
The assault on the status of women began immediately after the Taliban took power in Kabul. The Taliban closed the women's university and forced nearly all women to quit their jobs, closing down an important source of talent and expertise for the country. It restricted access to medical care for women, brutally enforced a restrictive dress code, and limited the ability of women to move about the city.
The Taliban perpetrated egregious acts of violence against women, including rape, abduction, and forced marriage. Some families resorted to sending their daughters to Pakistan or Iran to protect them.
Afghan women living under the Taliban virtually had the world of work closed to them. Forced to quit their jobs as teachers, doctors, nurses, and clerical workers when the Taliban took over, women could work only in very limited circumstances. A tremendous asset was lost to a society that desperately needed trained professionals.
As many as 50,000 women, who had lost husbands and other male relatives during Afghanistan's long civil war, had no source of income. Many were reduced to selling all of their possessions and begging in the streets, or worse, to feed their families.
Denied Education and Health Care
Restricting women's access to work is an attack on women today. Eliminating women's access to education is an assault on women tomorrow.
The Taliban ended, for all practical purposes, education for girls. Since 1998, girls over the age of eight have been prohibited from attending school. Home schooling, while sometimes tolerated, was more often repressed. Last year, the Taliban jailed and then deported a female foreign aid worker who had promoted home-based work for women and home schools for girls. The Taliban prohibited women from studying at Kabul University.
"The Taliban has clamped down on knowledge and ignorance is ruling instead."
-- Sadriqa, a 22-year-old woman in Kabul
As a result of these measures, the Taliban was ensuring that women would continue to sink deeper into poverty and deprivation, thereby guaranteeing that tomorrow's women would have none of the skills needed to function in a modern society.
Under Taliban rule, women were given only the most rudimentary access to health care and medical care, thereby endangering the health of women, and in turn, their families. In most hospitals, male physicians could only examine a female patient if she were fully clothed, ruling out the possibility of meaningful diagnosis and treatment.
These Taliban regulations led to a lack of adequate medical care for women and contributed to increased suffering and higher mortality rates. Afghanistan has the world's second worst rate of maternal death during childbirth. About 16 out of every 100 women die giving birth.
Inadequate medical care for women also meant poor medical care and a high mortality rate for Afghan children. Afghanistan has one of the world's highest rates of infant and child mortality. According to the United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF), 165 of every 1000 babies die before their first birthday.
Further hampering health, the Taliban destroyed public education posters and other health information. This left many women, in a society already plagued by massive illiteracy, without basic health care information.
In May 2001, the Taliban raided and temporarily closed a foreign-funded hospital in Kabul because male and female staff allegedly mixed in the dining room and operating wards. It is significant to note that approximately 70% of health services had been provided by international relief organizations -- further highlighting the Taliban's general disregard for the welfare of the Afghan people.
"The life of Afghan women is so bad. We are locked at home and cannot see the sun."
-- Nageeba, a 35-year-old widow in Kabul
The Taliban also required that windows of houses be painted over to prevent outsiders from possibly seeing women inside homes, further isolating women who once led productive lives and contributing to a rise in mental health problems. Physicians for Human Rights reports high rates of depression and suicide among Afghan women.. One European physician reported many cases of burns in the esophagus as the result of women swallowing battery acid or household cleaners--a cheap, if painful, method of suicide.
Fettered by Restrictions on Movement
In urban areas, the Taliban brutally enforced a dress code that required women to be covered under a burqa -- a voluminous, tent-like full-body outer garment that covers them from head to toe. One Anglo-Afghan journalist reported that the burqa's veil is so thick that the wearer finds it difficult to breathe; the small mesh panel permitted for seeing allows such limited vision that even crossing the street safely is difficult.
While the burqa existed prior to the Taliban, its use was not required. As elsewhere in the Muslim world and the United States, women chose to use the burqa as a matter of individual religious or personal preference. In Afghanistan, however, the Taliban enforced the wearing of the burqa with threats, fines, and on-the-spot beatings. Even the accidental showing of the feet or ankles was severely punished. No exceptions were allowed. One woman who became violently carsick was not permitted to take off the garment. When paying for food in the market, a woman's hand could not show when handing over money or receiving the purchase. Even girls as young as eight or nine years old were expected to wear the burqa.
The fate of women in Afghanistan is infamous and intolerable. The burqa that imprisons them is a cloth prison, but it is above all a moral prison. The torture imposed on little girls who dare to show their ankles or their polished nails is appalling. It is unacceptable and insupportable.
-- King Mohammed VI of Morocco
The burqa is not only a physical and psychological burden on some Afghan women, it is a significant economic burden as well. Many women cannot afford the cost of one. In some cases, whole neighborhoods share a single garment, and women must wait days for their turn to go out. For disabled women who need a prosthesis or other aid to walk, the required wearing of the burqa makes them virtually homebound if they cannot get the burqa over the prosthesis or other aid, or use the device effectively when wearing the burqa.
Restrictions on clothing are matched with other limitations on personal adornment. Makeup and nail polish were prohibited. White socks were also prohibited, as were shoes that make noise as it had been deemed that women should walk silently.
Even when dressed according to the Taliban rules, women were severely restricted in their movement. Women were permitted to go out only when accompanied by male relatives or risk Taliban beatings. Women could not use public taxis without accompanying male relatives, and taxi drivers risked losing their licenses or beatings if they took unescorted female passengers. Women could only use special buses set aside for their use, and these buses had their windows draped with thick curtains so that no one on the street could see the women passengers.
One woman who was caught with an unrelated man in the street was publicly flogged with 100 lashes, in a stadium full of people. She was lucky. If she had been married, and found with an unrelated male, the punishment would have been death by stoning. Such is the Taliban's perversion of justice, which also includes swift summary trials, public amputations and executions.
Violation of Basic Rights
The Taliban claimed it was trying to ensure a society in which women had a safe and dignified role. But the facts show the opposite. Women were stripped of their dignity under the Taliban. They were made unable to support their families. Girls were deprived of basic health care and of any semblance of schooling. They were even deprived of their childhood under a regime that took away their songs, their dolls, and their stuffed animals -- all banned by the Taliban.
The Amman Declaration (1996) of the World Health Organization cites strong authority within Islamic law and traditions that support the right to education for both girls and boys as well as the right to earn a living and participate in public life.
Indeed, the Taliban's discriminatory policies violate many of the basic principles of international human rights law. These rights include the right to freedom of expression, association and assembly, the right to work, the right to education, freedom of movement, and the right to health care. What is more, as Human Rights Watch has noted, “the discrimination [that Afghan women face] is cumulative and so overwhelming that it is literally life threatening for many Afghan women.” This assault on the role of women has not been dictated by the history and social mores of Afghanistan as the Taliban claim.
Nor are the Taliban's restrictions on women in line with the reality in other Muslim countries. Women are serving as President of Indonesia and Prime Minister of Bangladesh. There are women government ministers in Arab countries and in other Muslim countries. Women have the right to vote in Muslim countries such as Qatar, Iran, and Bahrain. Throughout the Muslim world, women fill countless positions as doctors, teachers, journalists, judges, business people, diplomats, and other professionals.
A large and increasing number of women students ensures that in the years to come, women will continue to make an important contribution to the development of their societies. In Saudi Arabia, for example, more than half the university student body is female. Although Muslim societies differ among themselves on the status of women and the roles they should play, Islam is a religion that respects women and humanity. The Taliban respects neither.
The long years of war and instability in Afghanistan have resulted in massive numbers of displaced persons internally and in neighboring countries. There are approximately 1.1 million internally displaced persons. An estimated 3.5 million Afghans have fled to Pakistan, 1.5 million to Iran, and hundreds of thousands more scattered throughout the border regions. Moreover, Taliban looting of humanitarian relief organizations contributed to the increased numbers seeking refuge abroad. Afghan women and children make up the overwhelming majority of the refugee population dependent on international assistance.
Afghan civil society and community-based activists are working hard to begin reconstructing their society in refugee camps, in preparation for the day when they can reclaim and rebuild their own country. Women have played an important role in these efforts, both in refugee settlements and--clandestinely--in communities in Afghanistan. These women and men, says Sima Wali, an Afghan woman who directs the non-profit organization Refugee Women in Development, “have already demonstrated remarkable leadership and ability. They are our hope for Afghanistan..”
In Afghanistan ... the disrespect of human rights has acquired extreme dimensions.. Overall, women in Afghanistan are basically not treated as people.... To overcome this, one needs to develop specific gender-oriented programs that would include, primarily and first of all, questions related to proper education for women.
-- Russian President Vladimir Putin
America's Concern
The United States continues to provide humanitarian assistance to all Afghans, including women and girls. The U.S. is the largest individual national donor to Afghan humanitarian assistance efforts. The United States has provided over $178 million in humanitarian relief in 2001. In addition, President Bush announced $320 million more in response to this crisis. The U.S. Government is working closely with international humanitarian aid organizations to ensure that aid is distributed fairly and with consideration for the needs of women.
Public concern for Afghan women and girls is growing in the United States. Numerous nongovernmental organizations have studied the detrimental effects of Taliban policy on women, and have worked hard to raise public awareness. Writer Mavis Leno, a leading activist on behalf of Afghan women, recently said, “Everything that constitutes human rights, but life itself, has been swept away from [Afghan women] by the Taliban.”
The U.S. Congress -- including members of both parties -- realizes that Afghan women and girls need the support of the international community. U.S. Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison recently introduced the “Afghan Women and Children Relief Act of 2001.” This bill would authorize U.S. humanitarian aid expenditures on health care and education for women and children. All 13 female U.S. senators are cosponsors of this bill.
Members of the U.S. House of Representatives have spoken out as well against Taliban mistreatment of women. The chair of the Congressional Black Caucus, Representative Sheila Jackson-Lee, said that Afghan women today are treated as “subhumans, fit only for household slavery.” California Representative Ed Royce, a member of the International Relations Committee, said the Taliban has “institutionalized widespread and systematic gender apartheid.”
The Afghan people want, and the U.S. Government supports, a broad-based representative government, which includes women, in post-Taliban Afghanistan. As Under Secretary for Global Affairs Paula Dobriansky stated, “We believe any future Afghan government should be multi-ethnic, representative, and respect human rights, including those affecting women and girls.” Only Afghans can determine the future government of their country. And Afghan women should have the right to choose their role in that future.
Today, with Kabul and other Afghan cities liberated from the Taliban, women are returning to their rightful place in Afghan society -- the place they and their families choose to have. Schools are preparing to reopen and women are praying again in mosques. The international community stands with Afghanistan and with Afghans in reclaiming their traditions and their rights.
"Afghan society is like a bird with two wings. If one wing is cut off, then society will not function."
-- An Afghan elder, interviewed by Sima Wali of Refugee Women in Development
-------------------------------------------------------
The Plight of the Muslim Women of Afghanistan under the Taliban
Islam means the submission of humankind to the will of God, not the submission of women to the will of men.

The four thumbnail photos above are taken from a video filmed using a hidden camera in Kabul on August 26, 2001 by RAWA, an all-female Afghan underground movement. It shows two Taliban from the department of Amro bil mahroof (Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice, Taliban religious police) beating a woman because she dared to remove her burqa in public.
"Treat your women well and be kind to them for they are your partners and committed helpers."
From the last sermon of Prophet Mohammed
"None but a noble man treats women in an honorable manner. And none but an ignoble treats women disgracefully".
Prophet Mohammed
(At-Tirmithy).
According to Abdullah ibn Mas'ud, the Prophet
is reported to have said:
If a daughter is born to a person and he brings her up, gives her a good education and trains her in the arts of life, I shall myself stand between him and hell-fire.
(Kanz al-Ummal).
quoted in Women in Islam by M. Mazheruddin Siddiqi
How praiseworthy are the women of Ansar that their modesty does not prevent them from attempts at learning and the acquisition of knowledge.
(Sahih Muslim, Kitab al Tahrat).
A person who has a female slave in charge and takes steps to give her a sound education and trains her in arts and culture, and then frees her and marries her, he will be doubly rewarded.
(Sahih Bukhari, Kitab al-Nikah)..
Some Muslim callers preach a false and ugly version of Islam and then complain because people do not accept it. I think that those ignorant preachers should be imprisoned or lashed because they divert people from the way of Allah and the truth that Muhammad, the final Messenger, declared.
Sheikh Muhammad Al-Ghazaly.
Muslims who advance conservative views on female affairs...are normally very literal in their understanding of texts; but they tendentiously opt for an understanding that suits their prejudice.
Dr Hassan Al-Turabi

Women have clearly defined rights in Islam. These have been set out in the Quran and Sunnah and also have been made explicit by scholars such as Dr Hassan Al-Turabi of Sudan in his seminal 1973 pamphlet, On the Position of Women in Islam and in Islamic Society and by the famous English convert to Islam and Quran translator, Mohammad Marmaduke Pickthall. Yet much as Pickthall lamented and condemned the non-Islamic treatment and "pitiful condition of Muslim womanhood" in India as long ago as 1925 in his lecture The Relation of the Sexes, today in 2001 we find the Muslim women of Afghanistan being treated much worse by the Taleban regime, who serve up a grotesque caricature of Islam and bring the good name of our beloved religion into such disrepute.

"The Taliban must be overthrown and this is an opportunity to overthrow them."
Benazir Bhutto, former Prime Minister of Pakistan.
Conference on the restoration of women's and children's rights in Afghanistan
"By ousting the Taliban, women's rights will be restored and they will have the right to work and vote." - Afghan President, Burhanuddin Rabbani.
Afghan women find new freedom
The Northern Alliance has announced that women in Afghanistan can now go back to work, and girls can go to school - activities that were banned by the Taleban.
BBC News, Tuesday, 13 November, 2001.
Release of Kandahar film in London
Iranian director Mohsen Makhmalbaf's Kandahar, winner of the Prize of the Ecumenical Jury at Cannes this year, was put on release at the ICA cinema in London Friday. The illuminating and timely release, given four-star ratings by the BBC and Guardian film guides, charts a woman's perilous journey from Iran to Afghanistan to find her sister.
Film-maker lifts veil on Afghan tragedy
A film based on a young woman’s desperate attempt to rescue a friend trapped by the Taleban is to receive a special screening at the White House. It may not sound like typical viewing for President Bush, but even he has fallen under the spell of Kandahar, a film that lifts the veil on Afghanistan and exposes its human tragedy.
The Times (London), November 10, 2001.

RAWA - The Taliban's bravest opponents
The Revolutionary Association of Women of Afghanistan is an all-female underground resistance of Afghan women who risk torture and execution to alert the world to the Taliban regime's atrocities. Here Janelle Brown tells of RAWA's activities and interviews one of their volunteers.
Risking All to Expose the Taliban
Julia Scheeres reports on the heroines of the Revolutionary Association of Women of Afghanistan
Wired News, August 10, 2001
We Muslims must decry the Taliban
'If Muslims really believe that Islam can be a force for good, why do they choose to ignore those who corrupt this potential?' Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, The Independent (London), 10 September 2001
Taliban have "hurt Islam and distorted the reputation of Muslims throughout the world".
Full text of the Saudi Arabian Government's statement on the breaking off of diplomatic relations with the Taleban
IslamForToday.com Tuesday, 25 September, 2001
The Taleban: Believers or Enemies?
English Muslim lawyer Aisha Harris contrasts the Taleban's treatment of women with the Islamic ideal.
Afghanistan's Taliban: Not a valid interpretation of Islam
"The extreme position taken by the Taliban hardly deserves to be considered an 'interpretation' of Islam... It is really an aberration in violation of the most basic tenets of the faith." Dr. Laila Al-Marayati calls for a fuller understanding among Muslims of Islam as "a religion that embraces the value of women without subjecting them to sequestration."
Perspective on Women's Plight in Afghanistan
We hoped it was just another example of the fabricated lies against Islam and Muslims. Reports sprinted through the airwaves that the Afghan Taliban ordered women out of school and out of their jobs. More distressing was the news that this was announced as a fulfillment of the teaching of Islam...
By Hassan Hathout, M.D., Ph.D.
Focusing on the Tragedy of Afghan Women
"The women of Afghanistan are suffering under one of the most viciously anti-female regimes ever to grip a country. Women who have been forced into virtual house arrest while much of the world has looked the other way."
By Judy Mann, Washington Post, October 30, 1998
Women and the Taliban
"As victims of the Taliban, they wanted the world to help them, but as good Muslims they did not want to be used by Western media to defame Islam."
By Azizah Y. al-Hibri, The Philadelphia Inquirer, March 11, 2001
The Taleban's other outrage
The Taleban have wrecked irreplaceable antiquities. This destruction has drawn worldwide attention--and worldwide outrage. And, yes, it is a tragedy that such priceless art would be destroyed. But there is a far greater outrage, one that, inexplicably, has received less attention than the Taliban's treatment of statues. That is the Taliban's treatment of women.
Chicago Tribune editorial, March 8, 2001
Fear is their Religion
Peggy Elliot speaks out against the Taliban treatment of women in Afghanistan.
Cry of an Afghan Woman
An Afghan Muslimah tells of the un-Islamic tyranny she and her family have suffered at the hands of the Taliban and pleads to the Ummah for liberation and justice.
The Rights of Women in Islam
Muslim Women Between Backward Traditions and Modern Innovations
by Sheikh Muhammad Al-Ghazaly
Risking death to expose the Taliban
Matt Bean of Court TV reports on RAWA an underground Afghan Women's group whose members run clandestine schools for girls and capture Taliban brutality on hidden cameras.
Restrictions Placed on Women by the Taliban
compiled by the Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan (RAWA), a political/social organization of Afghan women struggling for peace, freedom, democracy and women's rights.
Afghanistan - Beneath the Veil
Companion web site to TV documentary by Britain's Channel 4
Saira Shah's journey into the heart of Afghanistan reveals a country of desperate poverty, much of it brought about by the deliberate policies of its fundamentalist Islamic government, the Taliban. Women are deprived not only of education, medicine and freedom, but often of the very means of survival. Saira, the daughter of Afghan scholar Idries Shah, took a dangerous journey into the heart of her father's country. Starting in the vast refugee camps of Pakistan, she made her way into Afghanistan itself, where she found unimaginable brutality but also extraordinary bravery.
Life in Afghanistan under the Taliban
Transcript of a CNN online chat with journalist Saira Shah, August 27, 2001
Saira Shah is a freelance journalist. She was born in Britain, of an Afghan family. She first visited Afghanistan at age 21 and worked there three years as a freelance journalist, covering the guerilla war against the Soviet occupiers. Later, working for Britain's Channel Four News, she covered some of the world's worst trouble spots.
The Taliban's War on Women: A Health and Human Rights Crisis in Afghanistan
This report documents the results of a three-month study of women's health and human rights concerns and conditions in Afghanistan by Physicians for Human Rights (PHR). The extent to which the Taliban regime has threatened the freedoms and needs of Afghan women is unparalleled in recent history. Taliban policies of systematic discrimination against women seriously undermine the health and well-being of Afghan women. Such discrimination and the suffering it causes constitute an affront to the dignity and worth of Afghan women, and humanity as a whole.
Behind the burka
We should make the Northern Alliance sign a contract on human rights - especially women's rights
Polly Toynbee The Guardian (London) September 28, 2001
Women On The Road For Afghanistan
From the 26th to 28th, June 2000, a gathering of about 200 Afghan women took place in Dushanbe, Tajikistan, to write the declaration of basic rights of the Afghan woman.
Perspective on Women's Plight in Afghanistan
From the Muslim Women's League Homepage
Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan RAWA is a political/social organization of
Afghan women struggling for peace, freedom, democracy and women's rights in fundamentalism-blighted Afghanistan.
Women and Girls in Afghanistan
Fact sheet released by the Senior Coordinator for International Women's Issues, US State Department, March 10, 1998.
'Liberty' for Afghan women
"We have schools, higher education, we can work". Kate Clark reports from opposition-controlled north-eastern Afghanistan
BBC News, May 17, 2001
"I pray night and day that America will destroy the Taleban"
Fatima Syed, widow of Taliban massacre victim.
Women in Afghanistan - A human rights catastrophe
1995/6 report from Amnesty International.